The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: HP Agreement & AIA


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1313
Date:
HP Agreement & AIA


 

Good morning all

Just wanted to run something by you to double check that my treatment for tax purposes is correct.

My client (sole trader) took out a Hire Purchase agreement last year on a new van for work, I have seen the agreement and I am satisfied that it is indeed HP.

The total cost will be circa £19k with £2.9 of this being interest, so my understanding is that even though a deposit has been paid and a few monthly payments and legal ownership of the asset will not transfer until the final payment HMRC allow for the purchaser to be treated as owning the asset at the time the contract begins and that CA can be claimed from the time the asset is brought into use (CAA2001,s.67)

So for tax purposes I would claim AIA on the capital cost of the asset of 16.1k (the client is not VAT registered) and the monthly interest charges would be classed as revenue through the P&L, I do not want to claim 100% of the AIA as this would result in the loss of some of my clients PA so am I correct in that as AIA can only be claimed in the year of purchase any carried over will the go into the main pool and WDV claimed in the following years at 18% until the balance is below £1000

For bookkeeping purposes the fixed asset will be depreciated as normal and taken to the P&L and then added back for tax purposes

If anyone could confirm if my treatment is correct that would be great or if you think I have got it wrong then comments on this would be appreciated as well

Cheers 



__________________

Doug

These are only my opinions of how I see things and therefore should not be taken as advice



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:

morning Doug,

so nice to see a tax treatment properly thought through like that.

I assume (?) that the accounts are being prepared under FRS105 so no need to consider the alternate capitalisation of borrowing costs treatments under FRS102 or IAS23.

nicely constructed post matey which others should take away as a lesson in how its done.

kindest regards,

Shaun.

__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:

That's exactly the way I would have done it Doug, though it's nice to see that Shaun backs it up as being correct. (I'm QBE) 

 

Shaun matey, does FRS 105 or 102 come into it as a sole trader, I thought they were for Ltd Co's?



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:

Hi John,

I always thought that you were AAT.

On the applicable to sole traders question, it's ne of those answers which is "sort of"... HMRC simply apply financial reporting standards through the tax system in order to bring some semblence of conformity to financial reporting... Of course, HMRC will always adopt the interpretation most beneficial to themselves so the real difference is that the self employed do not have the companies act and financial reporting standards (as given power through the copanies act) to protect them from such interpretations. That said, as HMRC now hide everything behind "simplification" its easier to find it in standards and then look for how HMRC have interpreted that rather than the other way around.

When looking to HMRC for guidance I am often reminded of the hitchhikers guide to the galaxy where the document needed was free for all to see.... but was locked in a filing cabinet, in the basement of the council offices, with no lights and no stairs down to it!

laters matey,

Shaun.



__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1313
Date:

 

Thanks Shaun/John for the replies much appreciated

Hi Shaun, I like the analogy between HMRC and the hitchhikers guide to the galaxy

  



__________________

Doug

These are only my opinions of how I see things and therefore should not be taken as advice

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About